The verdict on your codebase.
You connect the repository, I read the code: all of it. Within 48 hours you get a written verdict and a one-hour debrief: what is solid, what breaks next, what to fix first. €2,000, flat.
A verdict, not a slide deck.
One PDF, written to be read by a founder. Four chapters:
State of the system
What you actually own: architecture, dependencies, security posture, and the honest quality of what was built for you.
What breaks next
The failures waiting to happen, ranked by likelihood and damage. The ones you would otherwise discover the day they happen.
The fix list
What to fix, in what order, and what each fix is worth. Priced, so it reads as a plan, not a lecture.
If this were mine
The plan I would run as your CTO: the first month, the first quarter.
No meetings until the verdict.
Request the audit
The short form below: who you are, and how many repositories the product spans. No payment on the site.
Pay and connect
Pay on the spot or from the email that follows; the read-only GitHub connection comes by email either way. €2,000, flat, up front; nothing to prepare on your side.
The audit runs
I read everything, with my delivery system sweeping at machine scale what no human reads line by line in a day. The clock: 48 hours from repo access.
The debrief
One hour, you and me. The verdict in plain language, the plan on the table, your questions answered.
Read-only, and it stays between us.
Read-only access
The GitHub connection grants read access only. I cannot push, change, or break anything.
One reader
Your code is read by me and the tooling I run for the audit. It is never used to train anything, and never shared with anyone.
Revoked after delivery
Access is revoked and working copies are deleted once the audit is delivered.
The verdict is 48 hours away.
Two minutes, no commitment: pay right after, or from the email that follows.