Your internal AI system.
Four months, one system: the AI your company actually runs on, built into how you already work. Then three months of La Résidence, included, to run it in production. Not a chatbot parked on top of your data.
Everyone bought AI. Almost nobody is AI-native.
Most companies buying AI today are buying subscriptions and demos. The tools are real, but nobody wires them into the way the work actually happens, so the gain stops at the individual who happens to like the tool. One person prompts well; the company works exactly like before.
AI-native is something else. It is a system: agents that carry whole workflows end to end, the data they need to do it, one interface your team opens every morning, and the documentation to run it without me. You cannot subscribe to that. It has to be built into one company at a time, on its real workflows, and that is the only version I have seen actually hold.
I am client zero.
ITzWorking runs on a system exactly like this. Client requests, task boards, deployments, the 2am bug: the machine behind my agency is an internal AI system I built for myself, and it is the reason one person can operate what normally takes a team. The self-healing house on the Résidence page is one visible fragment of it. The rest runs every day, quietly.
You will notice there are no screenshots and no internal numbers here. That is deliberate: what my system knows about my business and my clients is not for sale, and the same discretion will protect yours. I am not selling you a tour of mine. I am selling you yours: the same approach, your workflows, your name on everything.
Seven months, written down.
Four months of build, then three months of operation. The scope is fixed at the end of month one, not before: fixing it earlier would be a guess dressed as a promise.
The immersion
I move into your operations and watch how the work actually happens: where the hours go, what your team repeats, what only lives in someone's head. Together we pick the workflows the system will carry, the two or three that pay for everything else, and write them into a scope document. That document is also the exit: if it does not convince you, we stop there.
The build
The system takes shape in your name: agents on the chosen workflows, the data they need, the interface your team opens every morning. No big reveal at the end: workflows go live one at a time, and your team is already working in the system while it is being built.
The handover
The month that makes it run without me. Documentation written for your team, training done on the real system, and the scope document checked line by line: what was promised is what runs. Code, infrastructure, accounts: already yours, because they were from day one.
La Résidence, included
The system moves into La Résidence for three months, on me: watched around the clock, bugs fixed before you notice them, small evolutions shipping as your team asks for them. The build proved it works. These three months prove it holds.
Then you choose. Keep the seat at the public price of La Résidence, and I stay the developer of your system. Or take it fully in-house: everything was in your name from day one, so leaving whole is the default, not a negotiation.
What €75,000 actually buys.
One price, and no line can be removed. Here is the honest market cost of assembling the same thing yourself.
The immersion
A month inside your operations, mapping where the hours actually go, done by the person who will also build the system. The scope document is yours whatever happens next.
The system
A custom internal platform in your name: agents that carry the chosen workflows end to end, the data they need, wired into the tools you already use. Software you own, not a subscription you rent.
The interface
One place your team opens every morning: what the agents did, what is waiting on a human, what went live. A system nobody can see is a system nobody trusts.
The documentation and the training
Written for your team, not for developers: how it works, how to run it, what to do when something looks wrong. Training happens on the real system, on your real workflows.
Three months of La Résidence
After the handover, the system lives under my flagship offer: watched around the clock, self-healing, evolving. The public price is on this site; the three months are in this price.
Ownership, day one
Code, infrastructure, accounts, data: in your name from the first week, not transferred at the end as a favor. If we stopped tomorrow, everything already built is already yours.
Split across a consultancy, an agency, and a training vendor, with the ownership and the three months of operation not for sale anywhere, and nobody answering for whether it still runs in month six.
The internal AI system
One line. One name. Fixed before we start.
What this is not.
Four months buy a system, not magic. The boundaries are part of the offer, in writing:
Not everything. The right things.
We will not automate your whole company in four months, and I will not pretend otherwise. We pick the two or three workflows carrying the most repetitive weight and do those completely. A system that owns three workflows beats a demo that gestures at thirty.
The month-one exit
The scope is fixed at the end of the immersion, and that moment is also a door: if the scope document does not convince you, we stop, you pay for the immersion month only, and the document leaves with you. Nobody is trapped in a four-month build on a weak premise.
It needs you in the room
The system is built on how your company actually works, and only your people know that. I need a point person, access to the tools where the work lives, and honest answers during month one. Everything after that is on me.
One build at a time.
A build like this takes over my months, and the Résidence products I already answer for do not pause while it happens. So there is one build slot. Right now, it is taken.
The waiting list is exactly what it sounds like: no payment, no commitment, no ranking games. When the slot opens, this list is where I look first, and it is also how I measure whether this offer deserves a second slot.
The questions people actually ask.
Why €75,000?
What do we own at the end?
What happens after month seven?
We do not know what we would automate. Can we still join?
Can we see the system you run for yourself?
Why is the scope fixed? Our needs will change.
Who does the work, you or the AI?
What does joining the waiting list commit us to?
The list is the door.
I would rather tell you there are no seats than sell you a start date I cannot hold. Join the list: when the slot opens, you hear about it first.